threads
Page 1 of 1
Chevy/GMC Trucks \  1969 Burban vs 1992 Burban

1969 Burban vs 1992 Burban

Chevy/GMC Trucks Make Specific
views 266
replies 4
following 4
 
j-bird   +1y
looking for alittle info!i'm looking toward more of the 69'. They both have a 350,Both are Automatic. Witch one would be better being a tow pig? Witch one would be easy'er to Bag and lay 20's or 22's. Thank you for any help.
Wicked Fantacies   +1y
The 69 would be way cooler. As far as bagging they both are pretty straight forward u may have more sh*t to move in the 92 but u may have more things to upgrade in the 69 (brakes if they have drums u need to get 73-87 disc etc. rear end two which will convert to a nice 5x5 lug pattern.) The brake lines off of the 73-87 will fit in the frame rails u have now because its all the same design. Any more Q let me know
mazberrydelight   +1y
buy my burb, its set up to tow my 25' enclosed trailer even http://www.mautofied.com/listing-100052236.htm
fatboysS1O   +1y
go with the 69 regardless of what it takes to lay it out. 90% of the time, older=cooler in my book.
j-bird   +1y
Russell you have a good point.
Nasty Nate thank you for that little info really helped out.
Mazberry- thanx but that would be out of my price range for a poject. thank you anyways
the 69 comes with a 1995 High-output Vortec 350cid chevy motor and the 92 has i hear has a corvette 350. The only down fall on the 69 right now is it's alittle rusty.The plus's is all the new parts. Are parts hard to find for the 69's? This weekend i'll be taking a better look at it.I'll keep updates. and any other info Nate?
Page 1 of 1