threads
Page 1 of 1
Ask A Pro \  neg camber at full lift

neg camber at full lift

Ask A Pro Q & A
views 266
replies 6
following 4
 
tuckinlugs06   +1y
is there a way to min the camber...and why would the camber not be the same of each side...and other then drop spindles what other options i have..it has tube uppers stock lowers stock spindles
BioMax   +1y


Negative camber at lift is caused by the suspension being pushed past it design limit and unfortunately, without creating more camber when laid out, eliminating camber at lift is difficult. Without designing a suspension with longer upper arms, you're stuck.

tuckinlugs06   +1y

what about if i move the upper mount point out a small amount...i have seen them do it on yotas they seam to move it out and up alittle?
BioMax   +1y

That will just create positive camber at ride height. You can move the arm around to lessen the amount of camber at droop, but it will make more camber when layed out. I just can't see any way around it.
TwistedMinis   +1y
Didn't you lengthen your upper arm to get rid of some camber when laid out? If you just run stock arms and drop spindles you will have a very small amount of camber. I'm not sure why you are so against spindles.
tuckinlugs06   +1y

not everyone can aford 300 spindles...and i ordered tube arms the were like 1/4 1/2 longer than stock
BioMax   +1y

That is exactly why I build spindles instead of arms. There is little that can be done to change the geometry of a suspension with arms, but spindles can be built to make major changes. There still isn't much that can be done about camber though, the length and placement of the upper arm is what determines that.
Page 1 of 1