air vs. juice??

i know i know this is the forever never ending debate, but i was wanting some pros and cons for both set-ups. it might help me make up my mind on which way to go. thanks

my main reason for likeing hydros over air after having both is waiting for air to build up so i could actually hit a switch and this was with an engine driven so it was way quicker than a compressor. and hydros have the same soft ride at all heights with the accumulators unlike the bags which only rode good with a certain psi in them which didnt give me enough lift to turn my wheel.

Both are Awesome if Instaled RIGHT..

Both Phuckin Sux if instaled by half ass Hacks

Edited: 10/11/2005 5:15:46 AM by i_love_primer

^^^^^^^ i couldnt agree better. i installed the juice on my civic and the caravan & ill be doin so with the neon and the mazda. only thing i ever had done on the caravan was brackets simply cause that 3.0 v6 was a lil hard on the stock brackets so i got some 1/4" brackets made for up front and a mini bridge out back. however my air i dont know what the problem was but it had constant issues, i broke a couple valve prongs, i locked a valve up, i had the truck airing its self up, it was constant, bullshit. im not dissing air everybody has their own experiences im just giving mine, and the compressor for 5minutes is annoying as all shit.

I used to hate juice...until i got it....now i want even look at a bag set up unless it has lots of nitrogen..as far as dead batteries being a pain in the ass....i charge mine once a week and i can clown all week long. as with god damn faggot compressors you haver to listen to that fuckin hum for an eternity and a day. bottom line-COMPRESSORS ARE GAY