threads
Page 1 of 3
Chevy/GMC Trucks \  Bags Or Hydro

Bags Or Hydro

Chevy/GMC Trucks Make Specific
views 443
replies 21
following 18
 
Phat 86   +1y
I am debating on Bags Or Hydrallics and i want to knwo which yall think is better? Any Advice on what i should go with would help thx guys
jmn444   +1y
bags... no mess even if you fuck up the install... i'd still do hydro's on traditional style cars like old impala's and shit, but for newer rides my vote is bags...
Phat 86   +1y
its a 1986 Chevy S10 So its not a newer car
sonoma94   +1y
this question has been brought up here time and time again. It all depends on what you want for a setup, both have pros and cons, no one can clearly state to a scientific fact that one is better then the other.

although i would argue hydros,
gtphelps   +1y
Both have good and bad points. I sell and install an equal amout of both. Hydro parts and kits are better quality then the old days, same can be said for bags as well. For me, I run hydro's on my truck.
DBLT8K   +1y
unless your a switch whore i would go bags no mess and no batteries to charge not nearly as much maintnence but can't do as much cool stuff if your going to ask this question you need to tell us what you are wanting to get out of it
Phat 86   +1y
I want a good clean ride it has bags but we are re doing the setup cause the dont have any sort of shocks so i want a good clean setup and a nice layout a smooth ride and can you go side to side with bags?
sprtn20s   +1y
for an s-10..do baggs!!
Phat 86   +1y
ok well me and ray from sound expressions are gonna install how thick should the line 1/2" or 1/4"
olskool720   +1y
Originally posted by sonoma94



this question has been brought up here time and time again. It all depends on what you want for a setup, both have pros and cons, no one can clearly state to a scientific fact that one is better then the other.

although i would argue hydros,

^^^^^ what he says