best rear setup for high hp v8

max, some of those engineers are just butt hurt cause they didnt think of some of the cool stuff you do first

i have right under 500hp.. with out nos.

i had the kp setup but it couldn't handle it so i whent with art 9000s with there weld on four link





my trans is in the truck yet to test it out

is in ??? isnot

sorry i chuckled when you said "high horsepower "then mentioned 300+... but lots of good info in this thread

I side with maxx on this. He has raised good thoughts on this. You also have to take into effect bar diameter too. Since the bars might be placed on the bags..

not everybody can afford a 580hp Chevelle,900hp C10,and a 600hp Cherokee Bryan! you rich bastard!

i have an s-10 with 300 plus horse and my bags are on my lower bars and the ride quality is great but my launch isnt that good becasue my pinion angle moves 5 degrees and i just have the stock rearend

Edited: 9/8/2007 2:10:13 PM by gotboost79

My truck weighed 2560lbs from the factory. There's nothing left to it, I'd say when I'm done it will be around 2200lbs. HP to Weight ratio, yes, I would consider it high horsepower.

No need for 500+ HP, since I will never in a million years put that power to the ground. (in a useful manor atleast )

I have other toys to go real fast in. I brought this thread up because I'd say 99% of baggged trucks have ~100-150whp engines.

Originally posted by b12yan



sorry i chuckled when you said "high horsepower "then mentioned 300+... but lots of good info in this thread