threads
Page 2 of 2
Ask A Pro \  darn you max(frame size revisited)

darn you max(frame size revisited)

Ask A Pro Q & A
views 288
replies 15
following 10
 
smithchassis   +1y
Originally posted by Russ-D



the strength of tubing is in that its a tube, not just in the wall thickness. by the same degree, the strength of a frame is in its ladder design, not in the wall thickness. frames need to have "give", if they dont, they will break at the weakest joint. Even big truck frames, I should say ESPECIALLY big truck frames, are built to allow for torsional twist for energy transfer. Anyone remember the ford commercial where they deflected the truck frame 8 inches or so on one corner? The only thing you gain with a heavy frame is a low center of gravity.

and you will really regret trying to weld that 1/4 to the 1/16th thick original frame, because if the weld gets hot enough to penetrate the 1/4 you are USUALLY blasting clean through the 1/16th.

best post ive read in a while...

BioMax   +1y
Originally posted by shavedmax



max, technically isnt a 2x3 1/8 inch frame weaker than a 2x5 1/8 frame? by loosing the height isnt it more prone to flexing length wise? so using a thicker frame material would make it as stiff as the factory unit. i'm not so much questioning you as i am making sure that i could safely build a full frame with thinner(and cheaper)material. plus i can weld 1/8 inch with my welder, to build a frame with 3/16 or 1/4 id have to buy a new welder.



Yes, a taller frame will certainly be stiffer, but keep in mind that many frames are C-channel and not fully boxed, that changes things. You will also notice that a lot of frames might be boxed for a length, but then they switch to C-channel. There is so much involved with a stock frame that it tough to say what is right. The problem is that when a custom (overbuilt, stiff) frame section is attached to a stock (inherently flexible) frame, the area where the two meet is over stressed. It isn't that common to hear about someone's rear frame section breaking off, but what I do see quite often is overly thick frame material being used. There isn't really anything terrible about that, but it isn't necessary either.
relaxedmitch   +1y
This has nothing to do with this what you guys are talking about but, I just was reading my new Streetrodder mag and there is a '37 Max & the Bio crew did, damn nice job guys!! I really, really dig that car, keep up the good work, guys!
TonyatAirRide   +1y
Originally posted by relaxedmitch



This has nothing to do with this what you guys are talking about but, I just was reading my new Streetrodder mag and there is a '37 Max & the Bio crew did, damn nice job guys!! I really, really dig that car, keep up the good work, guys!

Now if you only knew what you were talking about Mitch.....

relaxedmitch   +1y
LOL!! I don't know anything about '37 Fords, but i did stay at a Holiday Inn express lastnight!!
shavedmax   +1y
Originally posted by BioMax



Originally posted by shavedmax



max, technically isnt a 2x3 1/8 inch frame weaker than a 2x5 1/8 frame? by loosing the height isnt it more prone to flexing length wise? so using a thicker frame material would make it as stiff as the factory unit. i'm not so much questioning you as i am making sure that i could safely build a full frame with thinner(and cheaper)material. plus i can weld 1/8 inch with my welder, to build a frame with 3/16 or 1/4 id have to buy a new welder.



thanks max! that had been bugging me for some time i guess i can order the mandrel bent rails i wanted then. this way the money i save on not buying thicher steel can go toward a nicer looking frame.would you suggest using 3/16 under the cab of a frontier crew cab, when building a frame from the front clip back? it has to be 2x3, but i am afraid that the length would cause 1/8 to flex too much

Yes, a taller frame will certainly be stiffer, but keep in mind that many frames are C-channel and not fully boxed, that changes things. You will also notice that a lot of frames might be boxed for a length, but then they switch to C-channel. There is so much involved with a stock frame that it tough to say what is right. The problem is that when a custom (overbuilt, stiff) frame section is attached to a stock (inherently flexible) frame, the area where the two meet is over stressed. It isn't that common to hear about someone's rear frame section breaking off, but what I do see quite often is overly thick frame material being used. There isn't really anything terrible about that, but it isn't necessary either.