DawgsledMazda
+1y
Originally posted by BAGD RANGER
JUST A NOTE --- PEOPLE ON HERE ARE SAYING STOCKS ARMS DONT LOOK AS GOOD AS TUBULAR ARMS ---- BUT STOCK RANGER UPPERS ARE TUBULAR --- DUUUUUUUHHHHHHH !!!! --- AND AS FAR AS STOCK ARMS BEING UNSAFE ---- I THINK NOT!!! ---- HELL IF THEY BRAKE FOR SOME UNFORSEEN CIRCUMSTANCE --- THATS DEALER SHIT ---- NOW IF YOU GET CUSTOM ARMS FROM A SHOP AND THE WELDS HAPPEN TO BRAKE --- DOES THE COMPANY PAY FOR THE VEHICLE DAMAGES -- I THINK NOT !!! ---- JUST THROWIN A LITTLE SOMETHING FOR YOU GUYS TO THINK ABOUT ----- ALSO MY BUDDIES GOT STOCK ARMS RUNNING 20'S AND LAYS DOOR ON HIS RANGER --- IT GETS JUST ENOUGH LIFT AND TUCKS JUST FINE --- IT DOES MAX OUT ON THE FRAME THOUGH --- SO I SAY THEN YOU MIGHT NEED CUSTOM ARMS -- MY TWO CENTS -- PEACE !!!
its the balljoint binding thats the weak spot, the balljoint binds then breaks. thats not dealer anything, thats whoever modified the suspension.
stock lowers are not very precise either. they use rubber bushings that are in now way precise. they barely fit back in after you remove them and the only thing they have over poly is they last longer and give a softer ride.
my first gen Ranger arms were designed off some shit ass DJM lowers.
the new ones are not. they were designed off a stock arm with frame measurements.
stock uppers are pretty strong, but they are also brittle, as they are spring steel. binding the balljoints will cause them to break in some cases. they will break before they bend usually.
tube lowers are definitely twice as strong as stamped steel stock ones. uppers are as well, but only in the categories that matter to us.