dssur
+1y
Originally posted by grip
Most people just can't figure out how to remove the flaws from a reverse and in turn talk down about what they do not understand........
No, I disagree. I think the real problem is that people with reverse 4 links say out loud that "it worked for me" and people, armed with that statement, try to half ass one into their ride. Reverse 4's were born out of neccessity, not proper design, exploer and caprice owners who dont want to lose their rear seating and truck owners who dont want to move their gas tanks.
fact #1: reverse 4 links work backwards in braking and acceleration. This is not me putting down something I dont understand, this is supported by any number of suspension design, physics and math books containing the "right hand rule of torque"
fact #2: reverse 4 links work in an opposite arc to the arc of the driveshaft, causing them to ether seperate or bind in nornal operation unless you limit lift/drop.
fact #3: reverse 4 links apply very large forces to the end of the chassis AWAY from the center of gravity instead of close to it like forward 4 links. This makes them prone to roll steer as BioMAx points out.
This tacoma owner is still steadfast on using his reverse 4 because he doesnt want to move his gas tank, not realizing that if he had installed it forward in the first place it would have 1) only taken about 10% more time to relocate the gas tank and 2) already be driving down the road safely. In addition, Dave (avtek) has shown you can install a very nice forward wishbone 3 link on a tacoma and not move the tank.
The people down on reverse setups quote physics and fact, the people up on them only say "it worked for me", which does more harm than good.