dssur
+1y
I dont have a problem with someone using it. Your money, your truck, as long as you educate yourself what would it matter to me? I am not a doom sayer thinking you will careen out of control and kill every pedestrian and baby (especially babies, maybe kittens too) on a street the first time you drive it. Its when the people who use reverse set ups recommend that others use them too, that I correct them.
It is wrong. There are about a thousand books on suspension design and none of them support a reverse 4 link. There are tens of thousands of physics and dynamics and statics and linear algebra books printed every single month and none of them have a supporting theory for a reversed rear 4 link design. It works backwards based on the principle of torque. It always will, and a whole truck bed full of "it worked for me" will never ever ever change it. Ever.
Make sure you are educated and then fly in the face of convention and physics if you like. Too me, my opinion only, is that it is half assed to reverse link a truck (a major undertaking) simply because you are too lazy to move the gas tank behind the axle. If you dont like my opinion, I will gladly refund all the money you spent on it.
I will listen to rational and lucid arguments based in FACT and PHYSICS as to why you should be allowed to recommend a reverse set up. Nothing else. I can use trash bags for condoms, probably never have a problem and it will probably "work for me", doesnt mean I should.