threads
Page 2 of 3
Mazda Engine General \  removing emissions????

removing emissions????

Mazda Engine General Mazda Engine Mazda Tech
views 11327
replies 29
following 12
 
audioinmotioninc   +1y
roger
thanks man... send those pics asap.... if i can i'll have it ruking nuts by the end of the week.

jeremy
mazdatweaker   +1y
post deleted
Post was last edited on May 13, 2009 06:05. This post has been edited 1 times.
layedoutb2k (chase)   +1y
he also had mentioned about getting a weber which is a non-feedback carb
mazdatweaker   +1y
post deleted
Post was last edited on May 13, 2009 06:05. This post has been edited 1 times.
ga,mazduh   +1y
i threw all that shit in the trash and mine runs great and it still has great fuel millage .. as far as the steel lines i just pinched the lines nad weled them up and made a diamond plate cover to close up the whols in the air filter other than that all is well .....low intentions
"clothing optional"
roger26i   +1y
you dont get it you have to plug all extra vac lines off you dont loose milage and it runs a hell of alot better you dont even need any of the sensors it is wired just like a carbed chevy when i post pics you will see i have ran the same setup for 7 years and it is well worth the trouble removing it
audioinmotioninc   +1y
FUEL CONSERVATION IS NOT ON MY AGENDA WITH THE TRUCK AT ALL.... I AM ONE THE FENCE ABOUT THE WEBER/PACESETTER SWAP OR 302 V8 SWAP. I AM WONDERING IF IT WILL STILL DRIVE WITHOUT THE EMISSIONS FOR THE TIME BEING SO I CAN TUB THE FRONT THIS WEEKEND AND DRIVE IT ON MONDAY.......I ALREADY HAVE THE 302.TRANNY AND EVERYTHING FOR THE SWAP..... BUT MY ORIGINAL 2.2 ONLY HAS 115 K ON IT SO THATS WHY I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE SWAP... ONE OR THE OTHER WILL HAPEN IN A FEW MONTHS BUT RIGHT NOW I NEED THE FRONT TO TUCK SOME LUGS FOR DAYTONA... THATS WHY I ASKED.
audioinmotioninc   +1y
FUEL CONSERVATION IS NOT ON MY AGENDA WITH THE TRUCK AT ALL.... I AM ONE THE FENCE ABOUT THE WEBER/PACESETTER SWAP OR 302 V8 SWAP. I AM WONDERING IF IT WILL STILL DRIVE WITHOUT THE EMISSIONS FOR THE TIME BEING SO I CAN TUB THE FRONT THIS WEEKEND AND DRIVE IT ON MONDAY.......I ALREADY HAVE THE 302.TRANNY AND EVERYTHING FOR THE SWAP..... BUT MY ORIGINAL 2.2 ONLY HAS 115 K ON IT SO THATS WHY I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE SWAP... ONE OR THE OTHER WILL HAPEN IN A FEW MONTHS BUT RIGHT NOW I NEED THE FRONT TO TUCK SOME LUGS FOR DAYTONA... THATS WHY I ASKED.
audioinmotioninc   +1y
FUEL CONSERVATION IS NOT ON MY AGENDA WITH THE TRUCK AT ALL.... I AM ONE THE FENCE ABOUT THE WEBER/PACESETTER SWAP OR 302 V8 SWAP. I AM WONDERING IF IT WILL STILL DRIVE WITHOUT THE EMISSIONS FOR THE TIME BEING SO I CAN TUB THE FRONT THIS WEEKEND AND DRIVE IT ON MONDAY.......I ALREADY HAVE THE 302,TRANNY AND EVERYTHING FOR THE SWAP..... BUT MY ORIGINAL 2.2 ONLY HAS 115 K ON IT SO THATS WHY I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE SWAP... ONE OR THE OTHER WILL HAPPEN IN A FEW MONTHS BUT RIGHT NOW I NEED THE FRONT TO TUCK SOME LUGS FOR DAYTONA... THATS WHY I ASKED.
roger26i   +1y
it should run great well it depends on if it ran good to start with