unusualfabrication
+1y
--------------------------------------------
fabricationnation said:
--------------------------------------------
UnusualFabrication said:
--------------------------------------------
fabricationnation said:
Chris you have completely ignored everything I Have posted to state my case. I even showed in a picture you took where the arms had been hitting the frame. If you look back in the BYC thread you will see the same marks on the arms pics posted then. I noted it then and then those guys all of a sudden shut the heck up...
address that instead of ignoring it. Yes stronger arms will prevent that from happening. so a larger and thicker balljoint plate notched into the arm tube prevents them from breaking even if they hit the frame. I did exactly that and problem solved, so why is it being brought up now? just so you can try to get a rise or try to prove your right about BYC. But you get shot down.
You post a pic showing something your trying to prove, I shoot it down with your own evidence and you ignore what I posted.
If you want to help lets discuss this in emails and we can go back and forth about machining parts.
since you are not a DHP customer and BYC does not owe you parts you should not be posting here anyway.
Plus everything you have posted is nothing but grabbing at straws and I have refuted everything with an intelligent plausible explanation. I dont have any evidence that grooves helps hold in the balljoint? again, are you kidding?
I see an aftermarket balljoints with grooves in it made to replace a factory balljoint with none. Hmm, why did they put the grooves in it then? Its certainly something that takes an extra step and more money to make. so why would they do that extra step and spend more money when the factory balljoint did not have them?? my assumption is to better hold the balljoint.
plus you dont have any evidence that the grooves dont help. I dont know how much more obvious it can get that that.
You have manufacturers of parts all over the world doing it yet you say theres no evidence that it helps. Hmmm, maybe you know more than the multi million dollar companies manufacturing millions of aftermarket parts.
--------------------------------------------The first bold statement tells me that you have no clue why but since you seen it on something else your going to do it regaurdless of wether its fact or fiction. The second bold statement is exactly why I don't add them, I don't have proof that the grooves help so i'm not just going to add them "just because" and waste valuable time. I've only ever used smooth cups, haven't had a balljoint drop out yet. I'm not going to add something that requires more machine time which transfers more cost to the end user, or slows down production, if it can't be proven to be "value added".
--------------------------------------------
I have plenty of clues why. I choose to use the rougher surface and I wont need to call them grooves anymore since they are no longer grooves. common sense tells me that a rough surface is better than a smooth one when trying to keep something from moving.
--------------------------------------------
Not true, ever use gauge blocks? Smooth as glass, rub them together and they stick together like glue! Rough up one side of one block and rub them together and guess what? They wont stick together at all! The more surface area you have, the more contact the parts make with each other, thus creating a stronger fit. I made tons of dies working at a die shop, dowels get reamed .0005" under, pound in a .500" dowel in a .4995" hole and see how easy that dowel comes out of that hole. Not easy at all. Heres a better example, put 250# weight on a smooth flat floor and try and push it across. Now sprinkle just a touch of sand over the same smooth floor and add the 250# weight. Which one moves easier? The 250# weight with a touch of sand under it because it has less surface contacting between the two surface. The 250# weight with more surface area touching the floor is much harder to move and thats what I want with my balljoint cups, more surface area of the balljoint contacting the balljoint cup.